Entertainment
 

Talk:Goku

From Dragon Ball Wiki, the ''Dragon Ball'' encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Goku article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

  • Be polite
  • Assume good faith
  • No personal attacks
  • Do not bite the newcomers
  • Respond in a mature manner
  • Be welcoming
  • Maintain civility at all times
Article policies
  • No opinionated research for articles
  • Have a neutral point of view
  • Verifiability
Archives
Archive 1 November 14, 2008

Contents

[edit] Age inconsistencies

Obviously, something's a bit off. In the introduction of the series, it says that Goku was 14 (which is supported by what he said in the manga) and about four years later in the Tien Shinhan Saga it says that he's 15. The latter statement seems more likely (assuming Saiyans age like humans do), but does it have official backing? If not, we can't really say that, but if so, we should probably note that the first statement about Goku saying he was 14 might be due to Goku's lack of skill with numbers. --
 talk contr 
07:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
That makes sense, except that because it seems like original research I think that should be avoided. Maybe after the "introduced at 14" statement, it could mention in brackets how this could be disputed by what Goku says during the Tien Shinhan Saga. I just don't think we should try to establish reason using speculative information (it's obvious Goku was grossly unaware of the world around him before and even during Dragon Ball, but it can't be 100% verified that Goku wasn't at least aware of how to count his own age by the time he told Bulma shortly after meeting her). This is similar to the "Broly's death" argument. Storm talk projects 13:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
He said he was Fourteen at the start of Dragon Ball? That's just impossible. He was shorter than Gohan. I seriously doubt that was an animation inconsistensy. But I agree with Storm's suggestion. It would be better to note it in brackets instead of replacing it based just on an assumption (no matter how supported it might be).--Neos 11:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
...I was reading the chapter maybe two days ago. My scanner's busted, but anyone else who owns the second chapter ("No Balls!") can tell you that the dialogue goes:
Bulma: Yeesh...!
Bulma: How old are you anyway, kid?
Goku: How old am I?
Goku: 14.
Bulma: EEE-YAA!! EEE-YAAA!!
Bulma: VOYEUR!! PERV--!!
Bulma: You're only two years younger than me!!
So not only do we know that Goku is 14 years old when Dragon Ball begins, but we can also deduce that Bulma was 16 years old at the beginning of the series. Storm talk projects
Sorry I wasn't completely clear before. I didn't mean we should replace the note about Goku stating his age was 14 (I also have seen the statement in the manga) but if there's other official material that contradicts this, we should make it clear that this was a claim and that it's possible he was in error. If there isn't anything official stating that Goku was 15 in the Tien Shinhan Saga (was this actually said somewhere official?) then we should remove that statement, as it does contradict the other instance where his age was revealed (no matter how off it may seem).
EDIT: Oh I see it's fixed now. Good show. :-D Where was it stated he was 15 BTW? --
 talk contr 
11:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
You said that he claims to be 15 in your first post haha. I wouldn't know personally, since I only own the first two Viz volumes and some issues of Shonen Jump that feature DBZ-era chapters, and I don't have the Tien Shinhan Saga in recent memory. Storm talk projects 12:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
I said that it [the article] says he's 15 during the Tien Shinhan, and that this seemed more likely than his being 14 at the beginning of the series, given his appearance. I'm not aware of anything official that says this though. Hence, my uncertainty about how to handle the inconsistency. Haha, now re-reading my first post I see how I gave that impression. I must work on my communication skills, me thinks. :-P --
 talk contr 
09:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Hahah, well hopefully someone with the saga in their collection will take notice to this discussion and help us resolve it. Storm talk projects 09:32, 24 January 2009

Goku is 11 at the beginging of Dragon Ball. He says he's 14 but only because he does not know how to count. At the 22nd World Martial Arts Tournament (roughly ONE year after the begining of Dragon Ball) he states he is 12 since Master Roshi taught him how to caunt (i.e. teaching him that 12 comes after 11 EVERY single time). So please stop changing the article to say Goku is 12 at the start. He is 11. And just in case anyone wants to argue he says he is 15 at the 23RD World Martial Arts Tournament, which makes sense since it is held every 3 years.--132.3.9.68 14:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

And which chapter/episode is this stated in? This is the kind of thing that cannot go unsourced, given the debate surrounding it. By the way, edits like the one you made to the article are deceptive. You changed the age from 14 to 11, but left the source confirming the statement that he's 11; this makes it look like the source confirms he is 14 years old at the beginning of the series. Storm talk projects 15:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, relax. I have the manga. In chapter 41: Kuririn vs. Jackie Chun (page 67 of volume 4) it is said:

Announcer: Kuririn, you said you were only 13 years old right? How old are you Son Goku?

...

Goku: Umm (counting on his fingers) 9...10...11...I'm 12!

Kuririn (Krillin): 12?! You said you were 14 before!!

Goku: That's 'cause I didn't know how to count back then! But the Old Timer taught me that after 11...comes 12 every single time!

[Audience laughs]

Bulma: I knew it!! No way he could be 14!! He never noticed what an awesome babe I am!!

And that's straight from the manga. Good enough? I do not know how to change sources so a member who knows how will have to do it please. (124.40.63.122 05:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC))

Just tell me what the name of the chapter is and I'll fix the citation. I only have the first two volumes so I can't look it up myself. Storm talk projects 14:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Very well. it is in Volume 4 (Shonen Jump Graphic Novel) Chapter (Tale) 41 Kuririn Vs. Jackie Chun (page 67). (124.40.63.122 14:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC))

Okay thanks, everything's been fixed. Storm talk projects 17:39, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I am the authority (132.3.9.68 10:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC))

Hey! who changed this to say Goku is 8 at the start of Dragon Ball? We already settled this! He is 11 and I have the sources to prove it (the source that is currently attacthed to this page). FYI whoever changed it. You provided no new source, so your edit is unfounded and confusing. I would LOVE to see you prove he is 8. He. Is. Not.--61.120.157.186 04:04, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

GOKU IS 11 AT THE START OF DRAGONBALL!! you all keep changing it, but you leave the source that I provided to say he is 11. You give no new source to prove otherwise so why are we changing this around--he's 11!!

[edit] missing saga

Hey how come their is no fortuneteller baba Saga --InoNOTHING 11:12, 24 January 2009 (UTC)on goku's articale?

Well, those stupid FUNamation saga names are dumb anyway. True Dragon Ball fans only reconize the sagas by there origanal Japanese names (i. e. DBZ= Saiyan Saga, Frieza Saga, Gralic Jr., Cell Saga, Majin Buu Saga.)

Hah. I'm a bit surprised that you didn't say Saiya-jin Saga, Furiza Saga, Garikku Juniya Saga, Seru Saga, etc. If you're going to be pedantic, you might as well be REALLY pedantic. Seriously, people can call the plot arcs anything they want. It doesn't matter. I'm kind of stunned that you said that a "true fan" would recognize the Garlic Junior eps at all (I grew up on the manga, didn't see the show until I was older, that stuff had no basis in the series). Frankly, this whole site has thrown me for a loop due to the differences in names from the Viz manga. 161.253.113.36 15:34, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Haha..whatever.

[edit] That is realy stupid

it is realy annoying with the hole alternate timelines whenever i read somthing because im saying its the same person so alternate timelines realy dosent make a diffrence.Vegerot 15:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

the people are the same they just look older until later when they catch upWatshisname 15:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC) yeah so even though future gohan isnt from goku,s time dosent mean he isnt his son.Vegerot 15:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Instant Transmission

This is stupid because when goku transported cell to king kais planet when he was about to blow up he was able to go to king kais planet while still alive, but after he died he wasn't able to instant transmission over to the real world fromm the other worldWatshisname 03:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Did u see the movie the return of Broly or somthing like that. Vegerot 03:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
I think that would be because in Other World, not everyone is deceased. It may be where souls are relocated upon death, but residents like King Yemma and the kais aren't dead themselves; they simply reside in and manage the world of the dead (I haven't seen the latter half of DBZ for years so I can't remember whether or not King Kai was the only kai who lived in Other World, but most of the kais visit Other World at some point in the series, such as during the tournament). Anyways, because not everyone is deceased in Other World, Goku could figuratively Instant Transmission there with Cell, but after dying in the explosion, he can't Instant Transmission back/downward to the world of the living. Somehow Goku breaks this rule in Bojack Unbound, but that's an unexplained plot device in a non-canon film and so it should be taken with a grain of salt. Storm talk projects 04:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


[edit] Thank You!

Whoever put on those new pictures. THANKS!Vegerot 16:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Please add categories

Goku used to belong to [[Category:Characters]], [[Category:Characters who can fly]], [[Category:Extraterrestrials]], [[Category:Saiyans]], [[Category:Z Fighters]] and [[Category:Tournament fighters]], but for the life of me I can't coax the category system into listing any of those on the bottom of the page anymore. Is it just me or was the old way of doing this like a million times simpler?

EDIT: I think I've removed all that was there, so if someone can add those who apparently knows what magic button to push, I'm grateful. :-P --
 talk contr 
10:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for getting those back in there. I'm officially afraid of touching categories anymore, but is there a way we can get rid of the duplicate entries with the <ref> tags around them? I was trying to do that last night but nothing wanted to show up anymore when I tried to do them the 'normal' way. :-S Thanks again. --
 talk contr 
08:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] The references aren't showing

They're aren't showing recently in the article. The link to the site isn't even showing. Dekoshu talk contrib 03:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

The formatting on the page is royally messed up. (See my above adventure.) If you know how to fix it you're a step ahead of me. --
 talk contr 
09:25, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Finally messed around with it enough to get it working properly again. --
 talk contr 
09:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


[edit] Alternate Names

I think that we should do that if you type in an alternate name in the search bar it will take you to that page!Vegerot 14:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

If you'd like to do so, you're welcome to! Simply create an article with the alternate name and insert #REDIRECT [[name]] on the new page, where name is the name of the article you would like to redirect to. --
 talk contr 
08:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

How do u create a new article?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!Hey word on the streets is Vegerot rocks!Vegerot (talk) 15:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)!!!!!!!!!

[edit] Dogi Symbols

Being the observant person I am, I couldn't help but notice that Goku's dogi (outfit) has different symbols on it at different times. For example... His first official outfit from Master Roshi has his symbol on it whereas the one he gets from King Kai has HIS symbol on it. The ones from Dr. Briefs during the Namek Saga have yet another symbol and I'm not sure, but I think the ones after that may even have different symbols on them there.
Anyway, my question is this: How many different symbols has Goku worn throughout the entire series, where were they located, and what do they mean? ~ Doc Lithius [U|T|C] 06:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Deceased Status

Shouldn't all of the character articles state if they are deceased or not??

--Hamachi1993 11:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Hamachi1993


[edit] Change Picture!

The old picture of Goku was better! This one was cooler but the other one is just better! And how the hell can I change it back! Vegerot 21:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)!


[edit] Redirect

His full name is Son Goku not just Goku!!!!!Vegerot 15:14, 25 May 2009 (UTC)!!!

You know, you could AT LEAST Provide a reason for it. We're using English names, ones that would be most familiar to English Speaking fans. However, in the English Version of Burst Limit, Goku Proclaims himself Son Goku , if you'd like to use that as a back up. But either way, stop getting your pants in a bunch over it Supersaiyanbatman 15:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


[edit] Voice

Why doesn't Toei seem to understand the concept of puberty? Goku, Gohan, Goten, Krillin, and every other male character who grows up in the series never has a properly aged voice. What's up with that? This unsigned comment was made by 74.192.36.120!

IDKBut in all things there must be balance. Without Evil there is no need for good. So ... from now on i pledge to be SO EVIL the rest of you pansies can all be good without disrupting that balance. 12:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)!!!!!!

Japanese people don't have puberty. Ether rogue 02:45, November 5, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Joke for King Kai

What's the joke that Goku says to King Kai in FUNimation's remastered dub? (Something about watches and cells) Bathman 17:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

this isnt a forum idiot

I'll answer anyways. IIRC, it goes something like "What's the difference between a *whatever makes watches... jeweler I think?* and a *something that guards the cells... I forgot*? One watches sells, and the other sells watches!" *rimshot*

[edit] Goku dead after fighting Frieza?

"The second time he did was in his fight with Freeza almost instantly due to a wish to bring back every one that was killed by Freeza that was made moments after (though technically he should not have been brought back due to the rule of the earth dragon balls only resurrecting someone once)."

Seriously, can you give me information about this? As far as I know, Goku never died against Frieza. He only died against Raditz and Cell.

--190.134.190.189 05:06, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for that editing.
--190.134.138.157 08:52, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Goku does die while fighting Frieza, but is almost immediately restored to life by the Dragon Balls. He continues the fight, and wins, surviving to leave the planet before it explodes. This takes place in DBZ episode 85, Gohan Returns. The death is confirmed by both Gohan and Frieza. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 22:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Goku does not die during the fight with Frieza. First of all, the Earth Dragon Balls cannot bring a person back to life more than once. Goku had earlier died against Raditz. Therefore, he could not have been brought back again. Also, a person brought back to life typically has their injuries healed. Goku did not get his injuries healed. Plus, I don't think a Saiyan would still be in their SSJ state when they're brought back. And if you're saying that Gohan "confirmed" his death by saying that he could no longer feel Goku's ki, just to let you know, that scene was complete filler. It never happened in the manga. 70.108.105.248 17:04, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

This issue was already resolved. While Goku is killed off in the FUNimation dub, this was a dubbing error on their part, and was very poorly thought out. Goku does not die in the original manga, so that is the version of the story we use on the site. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 20:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Trivia Section Cleanup

I think the Trivia section of this page needs a little work. Some of the trivia is not really even necessary. Like this: "He along with Broly are the only full blooded Saiyans who are not always frowning." I'm sure that is not true. I propose we remove the trivia that is not fact, or is simply not needed.(P.S, I new at this,so please don't flame me or anything.) Sonictheweasel 00:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

You're absolutely correct. Trivia isn't nessicary and most of it is speculation or original research anyway. That thing you mentioned about "frowning Saiyans" isn't true, it's speculation and OR. --MistressGojira 05:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] This articles way too long

Exactly what the title says. We need to trim it and organize it better. The Trivia section needs to be completely revamped. The only trivia that needs to be mentioned is that Goku is a parody of Son Wukong, the Monkey King. --MistressGojira 05:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quotes and others

Quotes aren't needed, because they are both unencyclopedic and vary from dub to dub. Not to mention they clutter up the article as it is, it's WAY too long, lots of things need to be cut down or removed, and lots of stuff falls under Wikipedia's policy of original research. Also the FUNI dub is so much different from the original Japanese script, so these so called "quotes" are simply things that FUNI cooked up. I removed the section for these reasons. This isn't a fan page where you can simply add fanboy crap, it's an article. --MistressGojira 17:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

SSJ2AJB I don't understand why you have such a problem with the current condition of this article. I beleive it's fine the way it is. Quotes are needed there because they list Goku's memorable and heroic sayings. They may vary from dub to dub, but this is an English wiki, so we're following Goku's English quotes. Other main characters have other memorable quotes and I don't see you doing anything about it. This is getting irritating that you're making such a big deal about the quotes being unencylopedic fanboy crap just because that you're not satisfied with the Funimation Dub using the quotes for the show instead of the original Japanese dialogue. Goku's quotes in the Funimation Dub is part of the show, not unencylopedic fanboy crap, so stop thinking that it is already. As for the article, it's really long because it lists every role of Goku's life in the Dragon Ball metaseries, his overwiew information, and transformations. Along with the quotes, I don't see why you have a problem with it. Nearly every character on this Dragon Ball Wikipedia has them in their articles and I don't see you doing anything about it, so don't think about removing important things about these characters.

It is unencyclopedic fanboy crap. Like I said, this isn't a fan page, it's an article. You compact and emphasize the most important information, and then move on. And these fanboy speculations are what plagues all these pages. Not to mention that nothing on this page has any sources. And you asked me why I haven't removed quotes from all of the pages, the answer is simple. There are way too many pages. It would take me all damn night. This page is cluttered with irrelevent and unverifiable information, speculation, original research (which are ALL against Wikipedia Policy). And to emphasize something, Kaioken and all its varients are not forms, the Kaioken is a technique, which is completely different. Also, we don't need a detailed summary for all sagas and movies, that's why we have pages for them. Also, we don't need every little heroic quote that Goku says, doesn't matter if its translated Japanese or from the FUNI dub. It serves absolutely no purpose because we already know that Goku is the hero of the series. That's a given. --MistressGojira 05:22, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Frieza Kills Goku

It happens in DBZ episode 85, Gohan Returns. Gohan says that Goku is dead. Frieza says that Goku is dead. What reason is there to believe that Goku never died? -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 23:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Gohan simply believed him to have died because he did not see his father nor did he sense his energy as Goku was apparently masking it. If you were to watch a bit further, Goku reappears and continues his fight with Frieza. SSJGoku93;talk contrib 23:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Haha, I've seen the episode a few times, no worries. If you check it out, inbetween Frieza and Gohan stating that Goku is dead, a wish is made to bring all those killed by Frieza back to life. If Goku had been killed, he would've been brought back to life underground, before resurfacing to restart the fight. Goku's fate is at best ambiguous, but evidence points toward his death. I was chatting with PrinceZarbon, who explained to me that this only happens in the Toonami dub, which is why I made the note on the dub page. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 00:14, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Yeah the whole thing that Frieza and Gohan say I would either consider a dubbing mistake on Funi's part (the original was just when they were starting out) or perhaps they did that to make it look like both Gohan and Frieza thought he was dead. However, he did not die, as Goku said nothing about that and later on. He was simply knocked down there and either masked his power or somehow it got blocked off from being sensed. Hopefully that makes it a little clearer. SSJGoku93;talk contrib 00:36, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

I agree with you, and wish that the dub was clearer in what had happened. Since the dialogue leads viewers to believe that Goku has died, and never clears this up, why not leave the info which does clear it up on the dub page? -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 00:41, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

I also thought he died fighting Frieza and got wished back. Thanks for the info. The Original Super Sayain 12:02, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

one thing i dont think anyone has noticed. Shenron would be unable to reserect goku since he had already been revived prior to that occasion Oni Dark Link 12:25, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

I don't know about other people, but I did notice that. I didn't think much of it, having seen the oodles of contradictions in other Dragon Ball television episodes, especially GT. To get the real truth, the best thing is to talk to people who have access to more original versions, like users on this site. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 18:10, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

Goku could have been wished back theoretically right? Wasn't it the Namek Dragon that brought everyone back to life?The Original Super Sayain 19:20, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

Nope, it was the Earth Dragon Balls that revived everyone killed by Frieza and his men. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 20:25, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quote

Goku is a really nice guy, this is one qoute he said "No! I never underestimate my opponent!" —This unsigned comment was made by 173.54.33.224 (talkcontribs) .


[edit] Super Saiyan, Super Saiyan 3 Kid

Before I say this I just wan to say i really haven't been active lately but now I'm back at it (annoying the hell out of people)!!! And now hello whats up with SSJ,3(kid)?!??!! I mean I kindu understand his normal kid form BUT o dont understand ssj,ssj3 kid forms BECAUSE SSJ ANS SSJ3 ARE BOTH MENTIONED IN HIS FORMS SECTIONS!!!!!Thank you taking time to listen to my post! 11:21, October 28, 2009 (UTC)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[edit] Goku's Name

Goku's name is Kakarot right? Well doesn't that sound like Carrot? That is a vegetable right? Shouldn't we add that?Adamthehedgehog 00:10, November 9, 2009 (UTC)

It's already on the page. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 01:51, November 9, 2009 (UTC)