Welcome
Edit
Hi, welcome to Dragon Ball Wiki! Thanks for your contributions.
Here's a wiki tip for you -- you can sign your name on talk/discussion pages by typing ~~~~ which automatically adds your signature and the date.
Check out Help:Contents for more tricks.
Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- 
talk contr 11:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome/ThanksEdit
I know you've been around for a week or two now, but now that you've registered it seems like a good time to formally welcome you. Thanks for helping clarify the issue on Super Saiyan 2! (The wiki can use all the help it can get in terms of removing unverifiable information and citing sources.) Drop me a message if there's anything I can help out with. -- talk contr 11:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
WelcomeEdit
Hi, welcome to Dragon Ball Wiki! Thanks for your contributions.
Here's a wiki tip for you -- you can sign your name on talk/discussion pages by typing ~~~~ which automatically adds your signature and the date.
Check out Help:Contents for more tricks.
Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! Dekoshu 16:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC) Show me your moves!
Dekoshu 21:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Let's talk in my page. I posted something in my talk page. Keep up the good work at editing. Maybe someday, you might become a admin. Remember your loved ones!
Dekoshu 01:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
I hope you keep up the great work, Bulletproof.
- I know what a dōjinshi is. On the Dragon Ball AF article for a while I had "manga" replaced with "dōjinshi" when it was used in reference to Toyble's work, until all this talk started about how Toriyama authorized Toyble to use the series name. But yeah, I know the difference between the two, thanks. I can't read much Japanese, particularly less the kana, so I can't follow it up any existing Japanese writings, so if Toyble's series is truely an unauthorized dōjinshi then I agree there's no point making note of it. Storm 05:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah exactly; I suppose I'll insert a prod into the article. Storm 05:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oops, it looks like I accidentally reinstated that Toyble's AF production was a manga series rather than a dōjinshi series when I was bringing back removed information from a previous edit of Dragon Ball AF. I'm pretty sure I've made my knowledge of the difference pretty clear by now (I certainly hope, hah), I just figured I'd drop a line to say that was a mistake, since you seem to enjoy schooling people on the definition of "dōjinshi" when they misuse the term "manga" in its place :P haha Storm 23:08, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Haha yeah you might give that impression just a teeny bit. It's all right though, I think some people here legitimately can't distinguish between the two (using proper terms anyways). Not that I mean to bring down such users, it's just good when others come along and provide such tweaks to make things read more accurately than before. I still feel kind of silly for falling for the deceptive statements about Toyble obtaining the rights to produce their ma....dōjinshi from Toriyama, haha. It doesn't really bother me much knowing its absolutely unauthorized though. I'm not very big on Dragon Ball GT myself, knowing it didn't have the Toriyama-flair behind it (even before I was aware of this I still had a less passionate attitude towards GT). Storm 00:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Dekoshu 00:15, 26 November 2008 (UTC) I still love GT, though.
Re: Disputes Edit
What issues do you need help on? -- talk contr 11:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Dekoshu 19:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Can you talk to me in Captain Falcon please, Mr.Bulletproof?
RE: False Super Saiyan Trunks Edit
Yes I am fully aware that Goku is it's only stated user. However, I felt it would be good to note that Future Trunks' took on a similar transformation, so I simply put it in the trivia section. As long as it's "theorized" or "suggested", readers know it is not confirmed. SSJGoku93 20:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Well in any case I re-worded it. And about the Super Saiyan 2 Gohan case, not everything the Daizenshuu says it entirely true (example: it states Raditz power level as 1500 while in the manga and the anime he even says that his power level is 1200). I'm not saying your wrong, but we usually follow the anime here on this Wiki and what Gohan did in the Room of Sprit and Time could be considered his first transformation (only lasted a few seconds). If you'd like to reword it be my guest, but I as well as others believe it is important to note that scene. SSJGoku93 22:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Dekoshu 22:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC) I know it's Room of Spirit and Time. Sometimes, you got to show the full name.
Good point didn't think about that while typing lol SSJGoku93 22:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
I've been really waiting for you Edit
Dekoshu 02:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC) Can you please talk to me?
Infoboxes Edit
I'm probably going to work on a new set of infoboxes. Feel free to comment and help draft out the fields at Forum:New infoboxes. ~NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Nov 24, 2008 @ 06:01 (UTC)
oh my bad didnt see it, i guess thing got outta hand. (Goten.GT1 20:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC))
Welcome back again, Sir Edit
Dekoshu 22:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC) Have you gotten the image for Blaster Meteor? Dekoshu 23:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC) "Show me your moves or I'll blow up this planet!"
Policies Edit
Currently there is no policy on userpages, fanart, or userpages. The fair use policy isn't even being used, but that is always tricky. Policies is something that the community would have to discuss to create. ~NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Nov 24, 2008 @ 23:59 (UTC)
Dekoshu 00:18, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
What do you mean?
Cleanup Edit
In order to start cleanup on the wiki, I've started the Forum:Wiki cleanup, image policy topic. Please contribute to the discussion so that you opinion gets heard when drafting the image policy. ~NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Nov 25, 2008 @ 05:42 (UTC)
Current conflict Edit
Thanks a lot. Have you seen the discussion on Talk:Main Page? It makes me glad to know it's not just me who recognizes this wiki has got some serious shaping up to do. And I agree with you about the wiki needing a third administrator. Sometimes I think about asking Nonoitall or Dantman if they think I'd be qualified for the role (I've done it before, my wikis aren't as active as this one but still I know what to do with administratorship). There's a ton of articles for deletion, useless redirects and unnecessary images that don't really need to be on the database that I'd like to remove if given the opportunity. Maybe I'll look into it. Anyways just wanted to say thanks for the backup in this ridiculous edit war. Storm 09:42, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your appreciation; after that doozy of a rewrite, I'm done for the night haha. Its last revision before the rewrite was another perfect example of disgusting image placement, I found. I did make a mistake in the bit about who designed Broly though, so thanks for clearing that up. I knew Toriyama had given Toei the okay to animate Broly without a tail, but I wasn't 100% on which party made the initial design (since I know Nakatsuru was the creator of characters such as those in Bardock). Thanks again! Storm 06:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Meh, I'm tired of this "discussion" anyways. It started out with a simple paragraph explanation of why his edits were reverted, which he removed and replaced with an (in short) "I told you I won't respond to you." Another user backed him up so I tried to clarify things again, only to be reverted. Another user came and voiced how he doesn't like me for reverting him before, and sided with Dekoshu, so once more I made a statement. This is getting out of hand though, and whether or not the user chooses to accept my explanation, I still addressed the fact. Sorry for being involved in such an eyesore on Recent changes! :O Storm 03:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what's left to sort out. Dekoshu seems through with reverting the messages that are left on his talk page, and has removed the messages he left on several users' talk pages vaguely telling of how I won't allow him to edit (which as you can see, makes me look like both an ill-mannered user as well as an abusive administrator, in spite of my real goals). If you scroll through my talk page though, you'll see this user always has some vendetta with me, which he dramatically escalates off topic. I don't mean to be unfriendly, but after reading through so many of these messages telling me to "be considerate to try not editing" because I'm coming off as a "bad person", how I'm stingy, how I think everything outside of wiki communities are "inconsiderate and insolently overbearing" (the list goes on), well, I'm sorry and I think you can agree with me on this one, but putting these stigmas on someone who reverts good faith edits in the process of trying to shape up the content of a wiki is just ridiculous. It's to be expected though, considering this is just the sort of thing we've been discussing on Talk:Main Page. Storm 04:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
I am quite sorry, 3bulletproof16 Edit
Dekoshu talk contrib 03:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC) I am very sorry for being antagonistic. It's just that I am always blamed and accused by some users about everything, and it's unfair and not good. Only some people disappoint me. This is getting out of hand and I really hate it when people take advantage of me, and consuming of what I think that really matters. All I wanted to do today is editing the articles. At least of my edits are still here. I want to be helpful, not being a rude troll. I am not like this in real life. All I wanted to do is edit the 100x Big Bang Kamehameha, but one user keeps ticking me off and take advantage of me with the past.
Same Here. Your Leader Mr. Kazi----- Talk
Dekoshu talk contrib 04:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC) I really don't believe Vixen is all of those bad things I said about him, but I think he should be more fair and without interfering everyone else. Also, he can be too much to deal with for some other users.
Dekoshu talk contrib 05:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC) My statements. Also, I hope Vixen learns when to stop harassing, and stop messing with me. And I hope he has a harsh life.
I am about to go insane with the two of them. They just refuse to listen. I know that blocking isn't right but I am running out of options. Thoughts? Your Leader Mr. Kazi----- Talk 4 January 2009
Oh, alright then, Dr.Kazi. I am going to stop communicating absolutely with Vixen Windstorm. If he isn't going to listen to you, I'll listen to you. I will also not respond to his messages. Just because it can be mercilessly edited, doesn't mean other people is going to enjoy their hard work go down the drain, and it's going to be the same with everybody. You know, real life isn't something you can do with what you're doing right now, and I'm honestly glad about it. Dekoshu talk contrib 06:52, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Huh? Why are you going insane from me? I haven't said anything in the discussion for hours. Dekoshu keeps adding new messages, I just got tired of feeding this fire. Storm 06:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Dekoshu, This isn't you man. I know that you are a better person than this. You are one of my best friends on this sites please try to get a hold of the situation. Cool Down some. Also let us get off Bullet's page. Your Leader Mr. Kazi----- Talk 4 January 2009
Dekoshu talk contrib 07:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC) Forget you, Vixen. You ain't immortal, and you ain't a god. I know you can die, and you're a mortal human that will someday die just like the others. You are never worth talking to you or even worth giving my attention to at all. What you're saying doesn't make sense, I know you can be wrong. Even if you're my friend now, and the conflict is over, you are of no value to me at all. You're going to deny it? Don't take me for granted, either. Enough of this, enough of that. You are no better than the bullies and jerks that I've met.
My friend I am sorry but you do need a break because I hate to say, but you are getting a little out of hand with your comments. Your Leader Mr. Kazi----- Talk 4 January 2009
Dekoshu talk contrib 19:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC) I believe this isn't how a reputable user should act. I am sorry if the previous messages sounds harsh.
Good evening, Bulletproof Edit
How are you doing? I would like to say that you're a great user. I hope you have good luck in your life. Dekoshu talk contrib 00:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Bulletproof Edit
How are you doing? I am honestly not happy of what is happening today. Do not get invloved because of me, please. I honestly don't think Vixen is forgetting about the past. This is frustrating and there's nothing I can do about it. :( I mean it. I am real sorry of what's happening today, and I'm being the center of attention. I am sorry for being rude to everyone. I want the conflict to stop for good. Remove my incivility and my personal attacks on the users, please. I don't have the answers at all. Should I go away or should I find something else to do? I am not worthy to do anything at all here, and everyone is better off without me here. They probably hate me and despise me anyway. They ridicule me, insult me, curse at me, bully me, annoy me, patronize me, etc. This is the situation I should not started in the first place. You never find me as a lot of help. I failed at everything, and nobody appreciates me. :( Dekoshu talk contrib 04:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
False Super Saiyan Edit
I could care less "The Daizenshuu notes that this form is Movie 4 exclusive" so i reverted your revision and made sure not to confuse the form Goku used in Warriors of the Dead with False Super Saiyan, if Future Trunks gets a trivial mention on the page so does Goku! SuperTron500 12:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, Bulletproof Edit
I'm doing fine. You? Thanks to you, I realized that I was arguing with the monitor the whole time. I shouldn't let them affect me in real life. Dekoshu talk contrib 02:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: How Goku dies Edit
Hey, thanks for letting me know about that bad page! Storm 
talk – projects 19:43, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Bulletproof Edit
How are you doing today? I was watching the Dragon Ball Z games and they're great. I find Goku to be a phenomenal character, and in Final Bout, if you build up any of your attacks enough, you can easily take down weaker opponents. In some games of Dragon Ball Z, the characters can take off the enitre health bar. It others outside of DBZ standards, this rarely happens. Dekoshu talk contrib 23:37, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
False Super Saiyan Edit
No offence intended, but removing the bit of info about Goku and keeping the info about Trunks was just a little too biased for my tastes, so i removed it aswell for the time. Feel free to re-add it should you see some kind of cause, at which point i will explain myself and my point further. We can even make a little debate of it. Thanks! SuperTron500 00:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Future Trunks Edit
Why is it perfectly okay to remove the note regarding the popular misconception Goku uses the False Super Saiyan form again in Warriors of the Dead? Yet the note about Future Trunks gets to stay with much discussion. I'd hate to think this is a crooked wiki because that would mean all my contributions were a waste of time. SuperTron500 11:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think theres something biased going on. It could be argued Future Trunks using the form is not a popular misconception. I never thought he was using it when i witnessed it, and i know a good handful of fans whom i'm 98% sure didn't think so either. I just thought that fairness was supposed to be a common thing on wikis, and to me removing the info on my part was fair. SuperTron500 17:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
New Manual of Style up for review Edit
Hi! I just wanted to let you know that a newly proposed Manual of Style has been written and is undergoing review on its talk page. Please make any of your concerns or ideas known so the manual can be finalized and put to use as soon as possible! Thanks. -- talk contr 06:29, 21 July 2009 (UTC)