Entertainment
 
[PrinceZarbon]

PrinceZarbon 9,467 edits since February 17, 2009

9,467

From Dragon Ball Wiki, the ''Dragon Ball'' encyclopedia

This is PrinceZarbon's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to PrinceZarbon.

  • Be polite
  • Assume good faith
  • No personal attacks
  • Do not bite the newcomers
  • Respond in a mature manner
  • Be welcoming
  • Maintain civility at all times
Archives
Archive 1 February, 2009 - June, 2009
Archive 2 June, 2009 - September, 2009
Archive 3 September, 2009 - Nov, 2009

Contents

Archived

I have archived my talk page. Feel free to ask any questions. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 01:14, November 21, 2009 (UTC)

Users that are in need of a talking to

Gotenks (GT) Weedle Mchairybug Dragula42

These guys are breaking a few rules and need a talking to --Silver Sinspawn 06:38, November 21, 2009 (UTC)

Planet Namick...

There is a user that has made a page named Planet Namick. The planet is spelt wrong and has about 2 lines of information about it worded very poorly. I think deletion is in order. Thank you.

Yeah, I suggest you read the message on top of the page. You'll need to take it to the other administrators. In fact, until December 1st, everyone's going to report all edits to the above editors. Weedle McHairybug 21:16, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks mate lol.... Im not very perspective :D

Hey all, I looked and there is no page by that name. Perhaps you made a spelling error when you typed the already incorrect spelling? If you could let me know exactly what the page is called, I would happily delete a page of spam. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 21:59, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

Deleted?

Im not sure.. I was going to post it on another moderators page but when i checked to see if it was still there it was gone ?? Very strange...

Lol, maybe someone wrote something on the page about the planet being a ghost... -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 22:06, November 22, 2009 (UTC) 
:O That explains everything :D

Why did my text go small ??

It's because you started a line with a space. 
That puts it in a box.
-- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 22:09, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

Line breaks

Hey there. I've noticed that people keep adding several line breaks to articles, which you have to delete or undo later. I guess sometimes people add these line breaks for some reason, but I noticed that the new Wikia visual editor ("Rich Text Editing" in the preferences), which I used for a while and broke several tables in this Wiki, is also automatically adding lines to articles one modifies, even if one doesn't change every paragraph near these new lines. I think we should either 1) ask the Wikia guys to fix that, or 2) fix our rules to comply with the visual editor rules. Otherwise, we'll keep wasting time on this matter everytime someone uses the Rich Text Editing mode to edit an article.--Sega381 23:07, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

why are the videos i put up on my page gone and they are in red

Rude user

Has this user been warned?Just look at his contribution page, all he saids is hes gay and the word penis.http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/204.113.205.61Saimaroimaru 03:02, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

That user was blocked. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 03:45, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

Yamcha Spaz

Can you please please please tell me which episode did yamcha give the speech about goku.......i know that it is in the android saga but i dont know when so can you please reply to my hotmail please that will be the best thing ever if you tell me. My hotmail is sick_man3@hotmail.com ok so please!!!!!

I have no idea which Yamcha speech you are referring to. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 15:01, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

New Images

Dodoria

Current

http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/File:250px-Dodoria2.jpg

New

http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/File:DodoriaNamekSagaFvN01.png


Zarbon

Current

http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/File:Zarbon_1.jpg

New

http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/File:ZarbonNamekSagaFvN03.png

I prefer the current as opposed to the new because the current is less widescreen. The pixelation isn't as much an issue here. The current is still preferable due to the "new" ones cutting off the top portions of the head (for Zarbon) for example. Do not alter them. They will remain as such. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 21:45, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism

User "Beadtmdc" just vandalised the page of the article "Otokosuki". I corrected it again, but still, vandalism is not okay.—This unsigned comment was made by DraculaCronqvist (talk • contribs) .

Are you sure on what you are saying? Double check the article and you'll see the change I made. -beadtmdc 18:51, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

The vandalism in question was made by an anonymous IP who I've already blocked, for multiple reasons, an edit earlier than beadtmdc's edit. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 20:07, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

Uh... Again, the article was vandalised. Now, this is just a proposition, but maybe the article should be under protection? And I apologize to "Beadtmdc". Sorry, I was mistaken, you didn't made the edit. Sorry, really! ^^

Yeah, no problem man! beadtmdc 03:27, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Line Breaks

Ok I'm confused. I've looked at the Manual of Style and I know that line breaks aren't cool, but I have never intentionally added them. All those times you blocked me, I wasn't trying to have a war with you or tick you off. But can you please tell me what a line break is exactly so that I can be more precautious and not get blocked (again..) ? (Banan14kab 23:03, December 2, 2009 (UTC))

As I pointed out earlier, users using the Rich Text Editor feature in wikia will unintentionally add line breaks to articles. PrinceZarbon, you should contact the Wikia admins to fix that, or we will see more and more line breaks from innocent contributors (or ammend the MOS to have more line breaks....). I don't know if this is Banan14kab's case, but it's worth checking out.--Sega381 02:03, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Thank You Sega381 for actually helping and answering my question(which the admins never do). Now I know why I continue to "add useless line breaks" (Banan14kab 04:54, December 3, 2009 (UTC))

Please be respectful to all users, including admins, thank you. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 04:58, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
And BTW Banan14kab, I'm also an admin :). I only happened to know the possible answer, while the other admins probably had no idea this was a possible cause.Sega381 22:51, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
In hindsight, maybe it would be wise for us to remove the rich text editor altogether in order to avoid this, in order to avoid useless line breaks. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 05:08, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

I agree. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 05:44, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

I don't know how to remove it from the standardized unit. We need to inform someone who is capable of doing this. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 16:17, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Maybe someone should send something about it to all of the user pages, or put something about it on the Main Page.--SuperSaiyan3Broly 22:57, December 3, 2009 (UTC)User:SuperSaiyan3Broly

SSJ3 Goku or Ultimate Gohan

Hi, long time no see. I think I found some contradictions that might support Goku as stronger than Ultimate Gohan. You warned me not to change the pages if you are going to insert some power level comparisons, but I was thinking more on the lines of a personal preference section to put in the Goku and Gohan articles on the debate between who is stronger. The reason I'm bringing this up is because I saw a paragraph on this argument on the Gohan article page, underneath the Ultimate form headline. Do you think I should add some thing like that to the Goku page? --SaiyanZ 23:56, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

We are not allowed to have any power comparisons on the articles themselves. They are non-constructive and useless. If anything, where we find an argument on any other articles (example Gohan article) we remove them. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 00:28, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

I understand, but this wasn't a direct statement on the Gohan article. What it is, is more of a implication. It doesn't definitively say Gohan is stronger. What it said was that it was implied. So, my question is, can I put something like this on the Goku page, as I have found evidence supporting SSJ3 Goku as stronger than Ultimate Gohan? If so, I will put the implied part on the Goku info as well. --SaiyanZ 19:38, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

No, all "implications" should also be removed. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 19:44, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Ok can you do that for me on the Gohan page? Nonoitall strongly advised me on not doing it. Perhaps if you did it, it might be better --SaiyanZ 19:48, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

I'd rather not remove any of the information for a few reasons. I'm not responsible for any of the hero-related article information. I only work with the villain articles. I'd rather not alter or remove any information from them (unless they are useless line breaks or vandalism). - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 19:51, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Hmmmmm, what do we do then, do we just leave the "implications" there? --SaiyanZ 21:26, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Obviously not, what you do is bring this up to my comrades SSJGoku93, and 10XKamehameha. Allow them to deal with it; I'm responsible for the antagonist articles; they're responsible for the protagonist articles. It's easier for us to work this way so we each have a fair share of articles to deal with. That, and the fact that I'm much more familiar with the villain articles. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 21:28, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I'll get right to it. Thanks for your help --SaiyanZ 21:30, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Lol, I'm only responsible for protagonist articles? I apparently never got the memo. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 22:07, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
No mate. You're responsible for anything you want. I'm merely strongly responsible for keeping track of the villain and antagonist articles as it's well over the amount to maintain and sustain on a daily basis. SSJGoku93 is responsible for the hero articles. The moderators (such as yourself and the others) are responsible for any articles you can stumble on or feel need to be fixated. However, I have strict authority over the villain articles because I must maintain their accuracy and revert any vandalism. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 22:30, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Yo Bro.stuff to delete

Goku doing the fusion dance with Adult Gohan?,nd a few videos that i cant find

File:Done.svg.png Done -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 05:44, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Edits

Sorry but lately when I make any kind of edit on a page, it inserts line breaks, can you tell me what I am doing wrong.User:SuperSaiyan3Broly

As mentioned above, it's probably the "Rich Text Editor" feature in the wiki. While the admins here are trying to find a definitive fix, try turning it off in you Configurations section.Sega381 22:49, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

OMG *hug* -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 22:53, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Hello

what up im jakari im a db dbz and dbct fan do u have dragonball raging blast--Jakari11997 14:31, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Raging blast is alright. I don't like the controls as much as the Tenkaichi series though. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 14:37, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Frieza

I saw that the Frieza power level has been changed to up to 120,000,000 but I have many sources saying that when Goku transformed into a Super Saiyan he had a power level of 15,000,000. I also have many sources saying Frieza's power level at 100% is 12,000,000 so I was wondering if you could change it to that.--SuperSaiyan3Broly 18:19, December 5, 2009 (UTC)User:SuperSaiyan3Broly

SuperSaiyan3Broly, why don't you check out our list of power levels page, it might clear things up for you. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 18:35, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Your right that may need to be changed too, PrinceZarbon changed the power levels to 12,000,000 and 15,000,000 just a few days ago.--SuperSaiyan3Broly 18:41, December 5, 2009 (UTC)User:SuperSaiyan3Broly
I don't know about the definite power level for Frieza. But I do know one thing, I am extremely tired of seeing people constantly revert his power level back and forth for the last 10 month radius. Back and forth. Back and forth. Can we please just obtain the correct one and keep it. Anyone who alters it again will be banned. This is annoying already. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 20:01, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

List of power levels says 120,000,000 (Frieza) and 150,000,000 (Goku) with a legitimate reference to Daizenshuu 7. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 20:16, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Then that's what it is. Not 12,000,000. If anyone reverts to 12,000,000, it should be considered direct vandalism. I've seen numerous random ip's do that also and for no apparent reasoning. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 21:45, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
BTW, the 12,000,000 figure comes from an very old, bad translation of the same Daizenshuu 7, which was corrected in later translations. Several fansites/fans are still stuck with that old and wrong number. That's one of the reasons that figure tends to come back to the articles.--Sega381 15:45, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

You know, on that topic, what's with Bulla's age? I've never edited it, but it seems to go back and forth constantly. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 22:09, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Since I don't follow up on any of the heroes or information related to them, I don't know which is accurate for Bulla. But I also hate how people keep reverting it back and forth also. Same problem. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 22:12, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

IT'S OVER 9000!

Sorry for putting things that aren't for this wiki's main interest, but I just wanted to congratulate you for more than 9000 edits in this wiki. Congratulations and let's hope that more 9000 come. Vegeta - San Talk Contrib 22:23, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

I am here to serve my loyal Dragon Ball community and secure the most encyclopedic resource possible, with the utmost accuracy and factual implications. Thank you my dear comrade. Though many of my edits are warnings, reversions, and fixes, but I'm very appreciative of your congratulations. I am here to serve all my fellow comrades; I love you all greatly. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 22:40, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

Radtiz and Nappa

Are Radtiz and Nappa capable of reaching Super Saiyan? (96.232.2.126 02:05, December 9, 2009 (UTC))

In the mangaverse, no. In the anime, no (as evidenced in their GT appearance). In the fictitious what-if gameverse, yes. But it doesn't actually take place in canon. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 03:23, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
doesn't even happen in the games bro. its a fan-fic exclusive.but thats the exact OPPOSITE of canon --Silver Sinspawn 06:00, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
Let's just cut it short and say that they don't. Besides, if they did, I'd have hated them too. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 07:05, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

So much hate, lol. Can't we all just get along? -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 07:07, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

No, not really. Kill the monkeys! Bring on the monkey-busters! Clayton's here with his shotgun. Tarzan and his apes better watch it! - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 07:08, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

thanks

thanks for that ill call on u if i need help

Images

Current

http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/File:Captain-ginyu.jpg

New

http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/File:Captain-ginyu.png

beadtmdc 15:56, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

This one seems not to cut off any portion of the character. I'll allow this one and alter it. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 16:16, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Jeice

Is there any reason Jeice's page has been changed to Jisu? I didnt want to change it back because I wasnt sure if an admin had wanted it that way or not Thunderbender18 02:57, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

Good find, you are correct the page should have been Jeice, meaning someone must have recently moved it. I've fixed the problem, and returned the Jeice article to its rightful name, that is the English anime name. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 03:19, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

Something wrong with Article

Hey im new to DragonBall wikia so i dont know how to fix this of explain it just go to the Tarble page. Finish Buster 08:05, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

If its not there anymore another moderator might of taken it of.

Android 19

New Image

http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/File:Android19RR01.png

beadtmdc 18:31, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

This one's fine. I altered it. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 18:33, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for my image

Thanks and you like my Semi-Perfect Cell image. I did stand it myself using Paint. SilverPlaqueVII;talk contrib 21:56, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

Category: Race Unknown

Hi. Sorry to bother you with this, but because I don't know this Wiki (I'm a guest from the Bleach Wiki) and you're the first admin I came across I picked you to bother. I was gonna start a category of characters with unknown race, but I figured I should pitch it to an admin first and get an approval. Weedefinition 16:55, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

It is unnecessary to have a category for characters with unknown races. Those with defined races are categorized, those with unknown or alien races... don't need to have categories describing that they are unknown, the very fact that they are not known is enough to non-categorize it. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 19:26, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

My point is not to make a new category for every race but to unify all the unknown races in one category called "Race Unknown". Just give it a thought, don't knock it right out. I'll do all the work, if you give me the thumbs up. Weedefinition 20:50, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

I'm giving you the thumbs down because there was a category like that and I deleted it, and will likely delete it again if it's made. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 00:51, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

I agree that that's not the best idea. I can name a ton of characters who may or may not be human... -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 21:32, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

Bummer dude! Weedefinition 11:53, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

FS and GNU?

It's been a while and I thought you might have missed me. I was wondering what the "FS" and "GNU" sections on the menu is about. The Original Super Sayain 18:06, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

I'm extremely confused about that myself. I've been trying to remove them from the menu but I haven't been able to locate the parameter that allows it. I don't know how that got there to begin with. Please bring it to the attention of other admins and moderators here on the wiki so we can resolve that soon. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 19:10, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Hey I told some other admins/moderators about the FS and GNU sections. Hopefully you can fix it. I have been wondering what it was about for a while.The Original Super Sayain 19:55, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Did you tell nonoitall? nonoitall may know how to resolve this issue as I've been trying for quite some time with no success. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 20:11, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Yea. I told 4 other admins. Hopefully one of them will know how to fix it. Your the only one who actually answers back though. By the way have you seen the new Iron man 2 trailer yet? It looks really good.The Original Super Sayain 21:04, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

What menu items? ;-)
Actually I'm not sure exactly why the items manifested the way they did, since those two items should have been completely different sub-items of the blog post item. I removed them for now though. (See MediaWiki:Monaco-sidebar.) --
 talk contr 
22:00, December 21, 2009 (UTC)


Thanks.The Original Super Sayain 22:10, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Dropping by

How are you Zarbon? I just wanted to drop in and see how things are going. I should be more actively on the Wiki again by the start of January, I'm looking forward to having time once again. Talk to you later, Merry Christmas or Happy Holidays, whatever it is you'd prefer haha.
 talk contr 
01:35, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks mate. Happy holidays to you too dear comrade. ^_^ - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 01:55, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Neko Template

Hey PZ, I hope everything's going well. I was just wondering if you told Silver Sinspawn to make a template for characters who were in Neko Majin. Silver had put a Neko Majin logo next to the DB, DBZ, and GT logos in the infobox of popular articles like Goku's and Vegeta's, and this seems strange to me as Neko Majin is more of a parody than an actual installment in the Dragon Ball series. If you said this was okay, then I'll put the logos back in the infoboxes, but I just wanted to double check. Thanks. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 05:12, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

No I did not say it was alright to have the Neko Majin material on the DBZ related articles. I told them specifically to limit all Neko Majin templates, and material, logos, etc. to the Neko Majin articles, and not on any DBZ articles. Please remove any instances you find that logo mate. ^_~ - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 05:15, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Hey now, I realize you are one the the more senior members of this site, but the consensus was to not delete the immortal category. The only decision made there was to remove the androids. In fact it appeared to be 2 to 1 against deletion, why would you do that? Also, please at least humor me and stop taking action about things that we are actively discussing. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 06:56, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

I replied on your talk mate. The definition of immortality isn't one who lives throughout the series. It's someone who can't be killed (ie: Garlic Junior). The rest are capable of being killed, therefore are not immortal. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 06:58, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Surely you can't believe that there is only the one definition of immortality. The character "The Immortal Phoenix" is immortal by title, and it can be killed. Have you ever seen the movie Highlander? It's about immortals killing each other. Besides, I shouldn't have to defend the consensus. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 07:00, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

This isn't highlander; and since the definition of immortality is whether or not the character can or can't be killed... we don't go by other perspectives or terminologies. If you want to create a category for the "immortal phoenix" alone... then feel free, but I wouldn't recommend it. It's just not worthwhile to have a category for 2 or 3 characters. I've had to remove about 10-20 other non-constructive categories in the past. Do you think it's worthwhile having a category just for 2 or 3 characters, baring in mind that we can't assume some are immortal just because we don't see them die as that would be utter speculation. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 07:07, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

You're just using circular logic to argue semantics here. I can give an equally valid argument and say that an immortal character is one who will not die of natural causes. By that argument, your definition is apparently wrong. You can see why you're not convincing me at all. You have also not addressed why the opinion of one user should be values over the opinion of two. Also, the category would cover at least ten characters with the accepted definition (mine, 2 to 1 vote), not two or three. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 07:13, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

We're not going by votes mate. This isn't a democracy. I ultimately get to decide whether or not the category is worth keeping. I merely brought up the idea to others to begin with so that I could see their thoughts to help me decide whether or not I should keep the category or remove it. What you need to do is convince me that it's worth keeping a category based on that definition. Or what you need to do is create two separate categories for the immortal definition, one for the "characters who will not die of natural causes" and another for "characters who can't be killed". Do you really think it's worth all the hassle, since neither of the two types are one and the same? I'm also not arguing semantics, the decision is entirely mine, not based on votes. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 07:20, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Okay then I'll restore the old category, but change the name to characters who cannot die of natural causes, to clear up this issue, which is most definitely over semantics. In fact removing that ambiguity about it will allow the androids to fit into the category beyond a doubt.

With that resolved, I was not aware that your opinion is worth more than those of others on the site, and I was most definitely under the impression that this is a democracy. Just a few days ago I mentioned to someone the Nonoitall gets final say over format, and he quickly corrected me stating that everyone is entitled an equal say in what goes on this site. Apparently he was wrong, or confused. I will also not try and convince you about the definition of words, since that's a silly matter being that virtually all words have multiple interpretations, and the thought process behind accepting just one is beyond me. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 07:30, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

I didn't say I have more say or that my opinion matters more. I said that I brought it up to help me decide whether or not to keep the category to begin with. Your opinion does matter, you've helped me greatly in the past. And now that you mention you want to have an entire category entitled "characters who cannot die of natural causes", I'll allow that mate. Just not listing Garlic Junior and Master Roshi under the same "immortal" category bracket as Roshi can be killed... but GJ can't. That was, after all, our initial dilemma with this category. I think we're pretty much on the same page here, it's just that we don't know how to maneuver this specific category so it stabilizes for all the characters without being misinterpreted. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 07:38, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Well I've created a Category comprised solely of "Characters Who Cannot Die of Natural Causes" and it's collecting members quickly. Hopefully this is totally unambiguous, and won't be controversial. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 07:42, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Obviously not. ^_^ I love everyone here (well most, not the vandalizers, lol) Thanks for correcting it by the way. I hold you in great esteem. I don't even need to tell you that, you know it. ^_~ - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 07:44, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Well thanks for that, it is nice to hear. I've added a large number of entries into the category, so hopefully it will be useful. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 07:52, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

I posted the same message on your talk mate. ^_^. Very well that the title of the category has been fixated... Yeah, that was really fast and thorough. Well done. - PrinceZarbon talk contrib 07:54, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks buddy. -- .10X.Ka.me.ha.me.ha.....talk.....contrib. 08:01, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:PrinceZarbon"